Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro has a general score of 77, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Although Honor 50 Pro is a bit heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's just a bit thinner and newer. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor 50 Pro has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Honor 50 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller display.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Honor 50 Pro and OPPO Reno3 Pro both count with similar battery durations, although the Honor 50 Pro has just 4000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
The Honor 50 Pro's camera is just as good as the camera in OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although the Honor 50 Pro has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.