Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a global score of 77.7 against 72. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. HTC One M9 is a noticeably older and thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but HTC made it lighter anyway.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixel density. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits processor.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures better videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger camera aperture and a much more MP back facing camera.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.