Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. The HTC U Ultra body is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
HTC U Ultra has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.