Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a general score of 77.6 against 72. The HTC U11 body is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen.
HTC U11 features just a bit better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 34% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.