Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G5 has a global score of 76.1, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Despite of the fact that the LG G5 is noticeably older than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but LG G5 has 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better processing power than LG G5, because it has 4 more 2.2 gigahertz processing cores and 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little sharper display than LG G5, because although it has a way lower pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger screen.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a greater camera than LG G5, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more MP camera. LG G5 has a much bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than LG G5, because it has a 44 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.