Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has an overall score of 77, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. Even though LG G7 Fit is older than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster). The LG G7 Fit features a slightly better screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less brightness and a little smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features improved battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.