Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a overall score of 81 against 72. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. LG G7 ThinQ is an older phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but LG was able to build it a little lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The LG G7 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and less bright screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has superior battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.