Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's overall score of 72. Although the LG G8 ThinQ is older and just a bit thicker than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
LG G8 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LG G8 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and much lower brightness, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a greater pixel density.
LG G8 ThinQ has a very superior storage for apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and/or video in low light environments and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.