Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 82.5 score against 72. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but LG G8S ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. The LG G8S ThinQ body is a little thinner but just a little heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and both of them were only released with a few months difference.
LG G8S ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a just a little higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a way better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a camera with a much better resolution. The LG G8S ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little longer battery life than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.