Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a general score of 82.7 against 72. LG G8X ThinQ's construction is a little heavier and just a little thicker than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The LG G8X ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little greater pixel amount per inch in the screen. The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot more MP camera and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG G8X ThinQ has much more storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery performance in OPPO Reno3 Pro, although the LG G8X ThinQ has a 1% lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.