Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K52 has a score of 76, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Even being the best in this comparison, the LG K52 is an a little thicker and just a bit heavier device than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
The LG K52 has a processing unit that's very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's processing unit, and although the LG K52 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG K52 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a greater camera than LG K52, and although they both have a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a way better resolution back camera.
LG K52 and OPPO Reno3 Pro have very similar battery performance, although the LG K52 has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.