Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Sky Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K62 is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a general score of 78.2 against 72. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Even being the best we are comparing here, LG K62 is an a little heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of screen and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution. LG K62 features a processor that's just as good as the CPU in OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although the LG K62 has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG K62 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG K62 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K62 features a battery life that is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, although the LG K62 has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a way better camera than LG K62, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot better video quality, a lot higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.