Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 overall score. The LG K92 design is just a little bit thicker and heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better display than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little better amount of pixels in each inch of screen. The LG K92 features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Reno3 Pro, although the LG K92 has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh. The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG K92, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same resolution back camera, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.