Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Mirror black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 has a score of 77.9, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. LG Q70 is a somewhat heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but both are 0.32inches thick. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a sharper display than LG Q70, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a little bit higher display pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG Q70 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG Q70's battery performance is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's battery lifetime, although the LG Q70 has a 1% lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.