Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a global score of 78.6 against 72. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but LG V10 has older 5.1 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. LG V10 is a way older, a bit heavier and a little thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro.
The LG V10 counts with a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The LG V10 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a quite better hardware performance than LG V10, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than LG V10, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.