Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. LG V30S ThinQ is an older phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but LG managed to make it just a bit lighter and just a little thinner. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a quite inferior pixels amount per inch of screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
OPPO Reno3 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a much more mega-pixels camera.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.