Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a score of 81.3 against 72. Despite of the fact that the LG V35 ThinQ is older than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse pixel amount in each inch of screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4025mAh battery size. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.