Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a global score of 81.2 against 72. Although LG V40 ThinQ is older than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS, so both should give you all the same OS features.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, they both have a same size screen.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more megapixels back camera.
The LG V40 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro has better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.