Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is way better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 general score. Despite being the best device in this comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is an extremely heavier and a little thicker device than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you some extra features.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V60 ThinQ has a superior memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cores. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate, the same sensor size, a camera in the back with a 64 mega pixels and the same 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG V60 ThinQ features improved battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 24% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.