Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 72. Even though LG Velvet and OPPO Reno3 Pro were only released 2 months apart, LG Velvet's design is a little heavier but just a little bit thinner. The LG Velvet features just a bit better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a brighter screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density. LG Velvet features a much greater memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures.
The LG Velvet has a bit better battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.