Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a overall score of 83.4 against 72. Even though the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is notably newer than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. These phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a bit more brightness and a just a bit better pixel count per display inch.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much greater storage to install games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has more internal storage. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.