Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 general score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides some extra features. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is a little heavier.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity per inch of display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a quite bigger screen and a much brighter screen.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video and a smaller sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.