Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a overall score of 87.1 against 72. These devices use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, offering a couple additional features and increased performance. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it's somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit sharper display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a quite worse display density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with way more display brightness and a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better camera than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.