Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G has a score of 81.5, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Both devices in this review work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features. Moto G 5G is a newer phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a bit better pixel density.
Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a superior camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much more MP back camera.
Moto G 5G has better battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.