Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Surfing blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus has a global score of 82.6, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 global score. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, the Moto G 5G Plus body is somewhat heavier and a little thicker than OPPO Reno3 Pro. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's CPU is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, and although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Moto G 5G Plus features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with superior battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.