Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. The Moto G200 5G design is newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it offers some extra features and better performance.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little higher screen pixel density. The Moto G200 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro takes slightly better videos and photos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Moto G200 5G's memory for games and applications is very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G200 5G has better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 24% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.