Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G51 5G has a score of 77.8, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 overall score. Even though the Moto G51 5G is newer than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Moto G51 5G has the newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, providing a couple additional features and enhanced performance.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a quite better pixel number per screen inch. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way higher (4K) video definition. Moto G51 5G counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Moto G51 5G has longer battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.