Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G60s is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a overall score of 79.9 against 72. Motorola Moto G60s is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G60s has a newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, offering some additional features.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Moto G60s counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
Moto G60s counts with longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 24% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.