Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's overall score of 72. Although Motorola Moto Z Force is noticeably older than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's construction is a little lighter and somewhat thinner. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, providing some extra features.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit superior CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has more 2.2 gigahertz CPU cores and more RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 15% larger battery size. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.