Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a 77.6 score against 72. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. The Moto Z3 design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it was released just a bit further than a year before.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a brighter display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a just a little higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little faster CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Moto Z3 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a camera in the back with a much better 64 MP resolution, a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations and a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.