Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 Play is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a general score of 76.3 against 72. Moto Z3 Play's body is thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it was released around 20 months before. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a quite bigger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit better pixels quantity in each inch of display.
The Moto Z3 Play has a very superior storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4025mAh battery size. OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.