Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has an overall score of 81.6, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. The Motorola One 5G Ace construction is newer than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's, but it is thicker and heavier. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little bit greater pixels density.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a much better storage for apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little better performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4025mAh. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.