Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a global score of 79.8 against 72. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also a a bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone. Both devices we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with some extra features and performance optimizations.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a brighter screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher pixels density. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola One Hyper features much more memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Motorola One Hyper and OPPO Reno3 Pro have quite similar battery durations, although the Motorola One Hyper has a 1% smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.