Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. Motorola One Vision is an older, just a bit thicker and a bit heavier phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. Motorola One Vision features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB.
OPPO Reno3 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.