Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting an 80 score against 72. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also a a bit heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better display than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a just a little greater display density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Motorola One Zoom features much more storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Motorola One Zoom features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Reno3 Pro, although the Motorola One Zoom has a 1 percent smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.