Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 411 pixels per inch | -- |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a 79.2 score against 72. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. Even though the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is somewhat heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's notably thinner and also extremely newer.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a way better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen and much worse brightness.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features superior battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.