Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a 75.8 score against 72. Nubia Red Magic 3S is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, we must tell that it is also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but nubia Red Magic 3S has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S features longer battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with better 30 fps video frame rates, a larger camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.