Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a 76.2 score against 72. The nubia Red Magic 5S is a thicker and notably heavier device than OPPO Reno3 Pro. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a really brighter screen, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same sensor size, a back-facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution and a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot higher video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 5S's storage capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both of them have the same internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.