Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | OnePlus |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-12-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Papaya orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 432.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 513 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has an overall score of 80.1, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren construction is heavier and a little bit thicker than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both of them should count with very similar operating system features.
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, although it has a little less pixels per display inch, a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little smaller screen.
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better camera than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and video in low light environments and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has just a bit better battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4085mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.