Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 has a global score of 79.7, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's overall score of 72. OPPO Find X2's body is a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and both were only released with a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
The OPPO Find X2 features a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has way less brightness, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite larger display. OPPO Find X2 counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 features a little faster CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 has a bit better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4 percent greater battery size. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes a little bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution back camera and a bigger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.