Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 general score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 operating system, so they should count with very similar operating system features. Even being the best in this comparison review, the OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has much worse brightness, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a higher screen pixels density and a little bit bigger screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro's camera is very similar to the camera in OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a bigger sensor. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4260mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.