Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting an 82.1 score against 72. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has the newer 12 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is a newer phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back facing camera with much more MP and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has greater battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.