Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 411 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A20s has a general score of 77, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. The Galaxy A20s design is just a bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, and both were only released with a couple months difference. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A20s has 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives some extra features.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen density and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A20s features a battery duration that's just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, although the Samsung Galaxy A20s has a 1 percent lower battery size.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs, a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.