Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 has an overall score of 76.1, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 has the newer 12 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features. Samsung Galaxy A22's design is newer than OPPO Reno3 Pro's, although it is a bit heavier and a little thicker.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A22 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22. The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.