Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having an 84.6 score against 72. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a newer cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little bit higher pixel number in each display inch.
Galaxy A22 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot higher (4K) video definition and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features superior battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.