Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G design is noticeably newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you lots of additional features.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel density, a little more brightness and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much more MP back facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy A25 5G has improved battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 24 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.