Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has a score of 79.6, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 general score. Although Galaxy A30 is older than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little higher display pixel density. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A30 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A30's battery performance is very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, although the Samsung Galaxy A30 has a 1 percent smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.