Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30s has an overall score of 79.8, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Although the Galaxy A30s and OPPO Reno3 Pro were released with only 6 months difference, the Galaxy A30s is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A30s has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy A30s features a very superior memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A30s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A30s counts with a battery performance that's very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's battery lifetime, although the Galaxy A30s has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.