Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 81.3 score against 72. Galaxy A31's body is a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A31. Both of them have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a display of the same size and the same count of pixels in each screen inch.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a larger camera aperture, a much better video quality and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a better storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A31 counts with greater battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.