Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having an 82 score against 72. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a newer and extremely lighter cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is just a little thicker.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the same count of pixels in each inch of screen and a screen with the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more screen brightness.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has greater battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 24 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.